The Mitzva to Dwell in a Sukka (2) The Difference Between Sukkot and Pesach
the
laws of THE FESTIVALS
THE LAWS
OF SUKKOT
by Rav
David Brofsky
Shiur #20
The Mitzva to
Dwell in a Sukka
(2)
The
Difference Between Sukkot and Pesach
Introduction
Last
week, we discussed the nature of the mitzva of dwelling in the sukka. We noted that the Talmud (Sukka 27a) distinguishes between the
first night and the rest of the festival. On the first night of Sukkot, one must
eat in the sukka just as one must eat matzot on the first night of
Pesach. Regarding the remaining days of Sukkot, the gemara says,
Just as there [Pesach] the first night is obligatory and from then on it is
optional, so too here [Sukkot] the first night is obligatory and from then on it
is optional.
We
examined the nature of the mitzva to eat in the sukka on the first night, and questioned
whether the gemara learns that one must fulfill the mitzva of dwelling in the sukka on the first night, or whether the
gemara demands that one actually eat on the first night, just as one
must eat on the first night of Pesach. We noted that some Rishonim equate
these two mitzvot, and even apply some of the other laws of the first
night of Pesach to the first night of Sukkot. We then explored the nature of
ones obligation to dwell in the sukka during the rest of the festival,
and grappled with whether the mitzva of dwelling in the sukka during the rest of the festival
should be regarded as a mitzva
kiyumit, a mitzva
that one chooses whether to be obligated in, similar to tzitzit, or
whether one must truly dwell in the sukka for the entire seven days.
This
week we will discuss the blessing recited upon entering a sukka and confront the question raised
by many Rishonim: Why is this blessing of leishev ba-sukka recited for the entire festival of
Sukkot, while the berakha said over matza, al akhilat
matza, is said only on the first night of Pesach?
The Blessing of
Leishev Ba-Sukka
The gemara (Sukka 45b)
teaches that upon entering [the sukka] to dwell in it, one says,
asher kideshanu
leishev ba-sukka. The Rishonim discuss two
central issues regarding this blessing: When should one recite this
berakha, and why is this berakha recited for the entire festival
of Sukkot, while the blessing over the matza is only recited the first
night.
The
Rishonim debate when one should recite his blessing.
The
Every
time he enters to sit in the sukka
all seven days, before he sits down, he recites the blessing, "Who has
sanctified us with His commandments and commanded us to sit in a sukka." On the night of the first
festival, he recites a blessing over the sukka and afterwards he recites a
blessing over the season [she-hechiyyanu], and he arranges the blessings
over a cup [of wine]. Thus, he recites the kiddush standing, recites the
blessing, "to sit in a sukka," sits
down, and afterwards recites the blessing over the season. This was the custom
of my rabbis and the rabbis of
The
Rambam rules that one should recite the blessing prior to its performance -
before sitting down. Although some question the Rambams focus on sitting (see
Rosh 4:3 and Torah Temima, Vayikra 23:42, who proposes that according to
the Rambam, one who eats in the sukka
while standing has not fulfilled the mitzva), the Rambam most likely
believes that sitting both reflects the formulation of the berakha and
constitutes a demonstrative performance of the mitzva.
Rabbeinu Tam disagrees and rules that one should only recite the blessing
of leishev ba-sukka before
eating in the sukka. Regarding
sleeping, the Rosh (Berkahot 1:13; see Rosh Sukka 4:3 and Tosafot Berakhot
11b, s.v. she-kevar) records:
The
Ri asked Rabbenu Tam whether one must recite a blessing over sleeping in the sukka, for the laws governing sleeping
are more stringent than those governing eating, for one is permitted to snack
outside the sukka, whereas napping
outside the sukka is forbidden.
The
Ri suggested that one does not recite a blessing over sleeping [in the sukka] because perhaps he will be unable
to fall asleep." In other words, theoretically one should recite the blessing
before going to sleep, but we do not, lest one does not fall asleep. Rabbeinu
Tam, apparently not concerned that one may not fall asleep, explains "[whatever
elements of] the mitzva of sukka that a person fulfills between one
meal and the next - for example, sleep, enjoyment, and study - the blessing 'to
dwell in a sukka' that he had recited
over the meal exempts him from reciting [another] blessing over them."
The position of Rabbeinu Tam remains somewhat enigmatic. Does Rabbeinu
Tam believe that the blessing of leishev ba-sukka was only instituted to be recited
when eating, or does he simply think that it is more appropriate to say the
blessing before eating, the primary expression of dwelling? Furthermore, the
Shulchan Arukh (629:8) concludes, It is customary to recite a blessing over the
sukka only at the time of eating.
Does the Shulchan Arukh mean that it is customary to follow the opinion of
Rabbeinu Tam or that it is customary to prefer reciting the blessing before one
eats?
The
Taz (639:20) writes that one who does not intend to eat bread during the day,
and certainly one who is fasting, should recite the blessing of leishev
ba-sukka upon entering the sukka. He apparently believes that
although it may be customary to recite the blessing before eating, the basic
halakha remains that one who enters the sukka should recite the blessing.
Similarly, the Mishna Berura (639:48) cites the Taz and quotes the Chayyei Adam
(147:15), who writes, When one leaves the sukka completely after eating and then
returns to the sukka, but will not
eat until the evening
in this case all would agree that he should recite the
blessing. According to this interpretation, Rabbeinu Tam only meant to restrict
the blessing to eating le-khatchila, as eating is the most demonstrative
form of dwelling. However, one who does not intend to eat should certainly still
recite the blessing.
R. Mordecai
Karmi (17491825) disagrees in his
commentary to the Shulchan Arukh, the Maamar Mordekhai (639:8). He explains
that Rabbeinu Tam believes that the blessing was only instituted upon eating,
and one may not recite the blessing over any other activities. When the Shulchan
Arukh writes, It is customary to
he means that it is customary to follow the
opinion of Rabbeinu Tam, who held that the blessing must be recited upon
eating.
Due
to this debate, it is customary to eat an item upon which one recites the
blessing borei minei mezonot in order to be able to recite leishev
ba-sukka according to all of the
opinions (Mishna Berura 46). Some Acharonim, however, including R. Shlomo
Zalman Auerbach (see Sefer Ha-Sukka Ha-Shalem, p. 654) and the Chazon Ish
(see Piskei Teshuvot 639, nt. 91) were accustomed to recite the blessing
of leishev ba-sukka upon
sitting or sleeping in the sukka,
even without eating.
The
Ritva (45b) brings two other opinions regarding the proper time to recite
leishev ba-sukka, which,
although they are not accepted as the halakha, are worth noting. First,
he cites the Chakhmai Tzarfat (Scholars of France), who assert that one
should recite the blessing upon performing any of the activities mentioned in
the gemara, such as eating, drinking, learning, etc. Apparently, they
believe that the blessing was instituted upon any obvious act of dwelling,
somewhat similar to the view of Rabbeinu Tam. He also relates that some believe
that one should recite the blessing once each day, upon entering the sukka. As mentioned above, the Shulchan
Arukh relates that it is customary to follow the ruling of Rabbeinu Tam and to
recite the blessing only upon eating.
The
Rishonim (see Rosh 4:3) record that the Maharam Mi-Rotenburg would say
leishev ba-sukka before
reciting the blessing on the bread. The Meiri (Berakhot 40b) attributes
this to fear of interrupting between the blessing over the food and the act of
eating. The Rosh explains this custom in accordance with the view that one
should really say leishev ba-sukka immediately upon entering the sukka. The Shulchan Arukh (643:3) rules
in accordance with the majority of Rishonim, who maintain that it is
customary to recite the blessing of leishev ba-sukka after saying ha-motzi (or
borei minei mezonot) and before eating.
The Difference
Between Sukkot and Pesach
The
Talmud (Sukka 45b) records a
difference of opinions regarding the blessing of leishev ba-sukka.
R.
Yehuda citing Shmuel stated, [The blessing is recited over] the lulav
for seven [days] and over the sukka
only on one day. What is the reason? In the case of the lulav, where the
nights form breaks between the days, each day involves a separate commandment.
In the case of the sukka, where the nights do not form breaks
between the days, all seven days are regarded as one long day. Rabba bar Bar
Chana, however, stated in the name of R. Yochanan, [The blessing is recited
over] the sukka for seven days and
over the lulav but one day. What is the reason? For the sukka, which is a Biblical commandment,
[the benediction must be recited all the] seven [days]; in the case of the
lulav, which is but a Rabbinical enactment [in our day], [a blessing on]
one day suffices. When Ravin came, he stated in the name of R. Yochanan, [The
blessing is recited over] the one as well as the other [all] seven [days]. R.
Yosef ruled: Lay hold fast to the decision of Rabba bar Bar Chana, since with
regard to sukka, all the
Amoraim adopt the same position as he.
While
R. Yehuda believes that the blessing should be recited only on the first day,
the gemara concludes, in accordance with Rabba bar Bar Chana, that one
should recite the berakha for all seven days.
This, of course, must be understood in light of the gemara (27a)
that teaches, Just as there [Pesach] the first night is obligatory and from
then on it is optional, so too here [Sukkot] the first night is obligatory and
from then on it is optional. The passage equates eating matza and
dwelling in the sukka, and asserts
that although the first night is obligatory, afterwards it is optional.
Last
week, we discussed how to understand the mitzva of sukka in light of this passage. Is
sitting in the sukka merely a means
of avoiding eating a meal outside of the sukka, does eating in the sukka constitute a mitzva kiyumit, or is one
truly obligated to carry out most of ones daily activities in the sukka? We must now discuss how this
question affects our understanding of the halakha that demands that one
recite the blessing of leishev ba-sukka throughout the week. Why do we not
recite the berakha of al akhilat matza upon eating matza
throughout Pesach?
The
Rishonim question why the blessing recited upon sitting in the sukka, which is said for all seven days
of the festival, should be different from the blessing said upon eating
matza, which is only recited on the first night of Pesach.
Seemingly,
this question should depend upon how we understand the mitzva of dwelling in the sukka after the first night, as well as
whether eating matza after the first night of Pesach constitutes a mitzva.
Some
Rishonim explain that while there is no mitzva to eat matza after the
first night, one who sits in the sukka fulfills a mitzva. Indeed, the Sefer Ha-Ittur
(Hilkhot Matza U-Marror) and the Maharil (Minhagim, Hilkhot
Chag Ha-Pesach) explain that one who eats matza does not fulfill a
mitzva, but regarding sukka, every moment that one sits [in a
sukka], he fulfills and you shall
dwell in sukkot for seven days (Maharil). Therefore, one recites that
blessing over dwelling in the sukka
for all seven days, and not before eating matza on the other days of the
holiday (Magen Avraham 639).
A
number of Provincial Rishonim (Sefer Ha-Mikhtam 27a; Orchot
Chayyim 26) cite R. Shmuel Shakili, who explains:
Rabbeinu
Shmuel bar Shlomo ztz"l answered that matza is different, because
eating it on the other days is not for the sake of the mitzva of matza, but for the
sake of his body to satisfy his hunger, because he cannot fill himself with
chametz. It is like someone who fills himself with the meat of a kosher
animal because he is unable to eat the meat of a non-kosher animal, but does not
recite a blessing, "Who has sanctified us with His commandments and commanded us
to eat kosher meat." But a person certainly does not dwell in a sukka for
the sake of his body or to satisfy his hunger, but only to fulfill the mitzva, and therefore he must recite
a blessing.
Matza
after the first night is viewed as no more than food, consumed to satiate ones
hunger, while we view dwelling in a sukka as a mitzva every night.
Others,
however, insist that even one who eats matza after the first night does
fulfill a mitzva. The Ibn Ezra
(Shemot 12:15), for example, insists that the peshat of the
verse And you shall eat matzot for seven days implies that there is an
obligation to eat matzot for the entire festival. Similarly, although the
Chizkuni (Shemot 12:19) does not suggest that one is obligated to eat
matzot for the entire festival, he explains that if one ate
matzot for all seven days, he fulfills this verse.
One
can possibly find support for this position in the view of the Geonim (Rosh,
Responsa 23:3), who explain that one need not lay tefillin during Chol
Ha-Moed, as Chol Ha-Moed is itself an ot because we dwell in the
sukka and eat matza on Chol Ha-Moed (Eiruvin 96b;
tefillin, which are also an ot, are not necessary on another day
described as an ot). Reportedly, the Gra (Maaseh Rav 185), as well as
the Chatam Sofer (Responsa, Yoreh Deah 2:191), explained that
matza is viewed as a reshut on the later days in relation to the
obligation of the first night, but it certainly is still a Biblical mitzva. The Arukh Ha-Shulchan
(475:18) concludes:
And
you should know that I received the tradition that even though there is no
obligation of matza except for the first night, however, there is a mitzva to eat matza for all of
the days of Pesach, as it says, For seven days you shall eat
matzot.
According
to this approach, we must find another way to distinguish between Sukkot and
Pesach to explain why the berakhot over the mitzvot are treated
differently.
The
Ba'al Ha-Ma'or (Pesachim 26b-27a), for example, explains:
It
may be answered: Because on the other days [of Pesach], a person can go without
eating matza and sustain himself on rice and millet and all kinds of
fruit. This is not the case regarding a sukka, for a person cannot go for three
days without sleep, and so he must sleep in the sukka and enjoy himself there
This is
the reason that we recite a blessing over the sukka all seven days, but we do not
recite a blessing over matza all seven days.
According
to the Baal Ha-Maor, since one must, inevitably, dwell in the sukka throughout the festival, the
Rabbis instituted the blessing of leishev ba-sukka for the entire week. The Avnei
Nezer (Orach Chaim 376) understands that the Baal Ha-Maor must
certainly believe that one fulfills a mitzva by eating matza, and
therefore the distinction between sukka and matza lies in the
inevitability that one will dwell in the sukka throughout the
week.
Interestingly, even if one views eating matza after the first
night as a mitzva, one might
view dwelling in a sukka as a more
obligatory one, a mitzva
chiyuvit which one must perform, and it is therefore worthy of a
blessing. Indeed, the Chatam Sofer, in his comments to the Shulchan Arukh
(Orach Chaim 639), writes:
One
is obligated to sit and to live in the sukka each day, only eating in the sukka [is not obligatory] except for the
first night
but there is an obligation to dwell and to live in the sukka for all seven
days.
If
so, the distinction, according to the Chatam Sofer, is between a mitzva which one can fulfill and a
mitzva which one must
fulfill.
The Difference
Between Pesach and Sukkot
Our
discussion regarding the mitzvot of sukka and matza leads us to the
conclusion that while the focus of Pesach is the first day, Sukkot is more
evenly celebrated throughout the seven days. The Talmud elsewhere
(Arakhin 10b) also seems to arrive at this conclusion. The gemara,
while enumerating the days upon which one says Hallel, states that one
recites the full Hallel on all of the days of Sukkot, whereas on Pesach,
the full Hallel is only recited on the first day. The gemara
explains:
Why
this difference, that on the Sukkot we complete Hallel on all the days,
and on the Passover Festival we do not do so on all of its days? The days of
Sukkot are differentiated from one another in respect of the sacrifices due
thereon, whereas the days of Pesach, [the days] are not differentiated from one
another in respect of their sacrifices.
In
other words, the mussaf offering remains the same for the entire week of
Pesach, which it changes each day during Sukkot. This daily change somehow
generates a new obligation, every day, to recite Hallel, in contrast to
the other festivals, regarding which one full Hallel is sufficient.
This distinction between Pesach and Sukkot may actually be indicated by
the Torah itself. The Torah teaches regarding Pesach:
And
on the fifteenth day of this month shall be a feast; seven days shall
matzot be eaten. (Bamidbar 28:17)
Concerning
Sukkot, the same section relates:
And
on the fifteenth day of the seventh month you shall have a holy convocation; you
shall do no manner of servile work, and you shall keep a feast unto the Lord
seven days. (Bamidbar 29:12)
The
festival of Pesach, as described by the Torah, is observed on the night of the
fifteenth of Nissan. Matzot, however, are eaten for seven days. The
festival of Sukkot, however, is celebrated for seven days. This distinction
emerges again in Devarim (16:3, 13) and earlier in Vayikra (23:6,
33-40). In fact, R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda
It seems that one can describe Pesach as having one focal point: the
evening of the fifteenth of Nissan. Although as a festival, Pesach is observed
for seven days, those remaining days appear as the wake of the first day.
Sukkot, however, is one long festival of seven days, reflected both in the mitzva of sukka, which is observed for the entire
week, and the different korbanot offered each day, each reflecting
another, new, day of the festival.
To what can we attribute this distinction? Seemingly, Pesach commemorates
a onetime historic event, which occurred on and is commemorated on the fifteenth
of Nissan. All Pesach rituals are performed on the night of the fifteenth of
Nissan, the night that the Jewish people left