Shiur #19: Keriyat ha-Torah and Har Sinai
Yeshivat Har Etzion
This shiur is dedicated in celebration ofAhavya and Hillel's successful completion of shana rishona.
Shiur #19: Keriyat ha-Torah and Har Sinai
By Rav Moshe Taragin
Keriyat ha-Torah (public Torah reading) is based on an intriguing source. Unlike typical mitzvot de-oraita which are founded upon pesukim or derashot, keriyat ha-Torah stems from a pre-Sinai response to a national spiritual crisis. In parashat Beshalach the Torah records that after encountering the Divine at the Red Sea through the epic miracles, the Jewish people wandered three days 'without water.' Though the literal reading refers to the absence of hydration, Chazal sense a more ominous danger: Three days had elapsed since their previous contact with Hashem. This detachment had plunged the nation into spiritual torpor. Recognizing this peril, the contemporary Nevi'im (a fascinating reference to Moshe and perhaps other prophets) instituted keriyat ha-Torah on Mondays, Thursdays, and Shabbat Mincha to ensure that three days would never elapse without contact with the word of God. Since the experience of keriyat ha-Torah stems from this pre-Sinai stage, the details of the halakha are more elusive; Unanchored to any legislative pasuk there are scant sources available to generate the constituent halakhot.
REENACTMENT OF SINAI
The Rav zt"l (Rav Soloveitchik) developed a powerful theory regarding the essence of keriyat ha-Torah. The mishna in Megilla (21a) asserts that Megillat Esther may be read while sitting. Commenting on this leniency, the gemara contrasts keriyat ha-Torah, which is UNLIKE Esther reading; it must be read while standing. Rashi believes that the gemara is merely "encouraging" standing during Torah reading as a "lekhatchila" ideal. Unlike Megillat Esther in which standing is meaningless, Torah reading should inspire greater respect expressed through standing. Halakhically though, keriyat ha-Torah may be fulfilled while sitting. The Rambam disagrees, concluding that standing is MANDATORY for keriyat Ha-Torah. He does not suggest a reason and certainly the requirement of standing is not immediately obvious.
The Rambam's reading of the gemara in Megilla is reinforced by
an interesting Yerushalmi in Megilla (perek 4 which is parallel to
the Bavli's perek 3). The
Yerushalmi cites an episode in which Rav Shmuel bar Rav
This vignette supports the Rambam's position and actually provides a logical basis. Keriyat Ha-Torah, the Rav claimed is not merely the collective or communal recital of Torah text. Instead, it REENACTS the pivotal moment at Har Sinai during which God's word was delivered to a human audience. As a redramatization of Sinai, the posture of the audience must resemble the quaking and trembling reported about the participants at Sinai. (Regarding the actual halakha the Shulchan Arukh requires that the baal keriyah stand but not the audience. The Rema cites that there are those 'who are machmir to stand' during keriyat Ha-Torah. See Orach Chayim 141:1 for a discussion regarding the reader and 146:4 regarding the audience).
The continuation of the Yerushalmi cites a related episode in which
the same Rav Shmuel bar Rav
This theory may be based in part on an interesting position of the Ramban. While listing the prohibitions which the Rambam omitted in his enumeration of the mitzvot, the Ramban cites the prohibition to forget the events at Har Sinai (see Devarim 4:9-10). The Ramban does not deduce any particular ACTIONS necessary to avoid this neglect and the violation of this mitzva - simple memory will do. However, the spirit of his description certainly supports the institutionalization of symbolic ceremonies to help recall the experience at Sinai.
FURTHER SINAI EXPRESSIONS
The Rav deciphered an additional element of keriyat ha-Torah based on this association to Sinai. The gemara in Megilla (21b) demands a minimum of three aliyot during keriyat Ha-Torah. Special days augment the number of aliyot but the base number remains the same. One version of the gemara attributes this minimum shiur to the three-part demographic division of our people into Kohanim, Leviim and Yisraelim. Why should keriyat ha-Torah be modeled upon this symbolic division of different populaces? [NOTE: This gemara should not be confused with the gemara in Gittin 59b which awards the first aliya to a kohen and the second a levi etc. That gemara explains the secondary evolutionary stage: having established the need for three aliyot (in the gemara in Megilla), how do we best allocate these aliyot with an eye to honoring the kohen as well as preventing contention in the struggle to receive aliyot.]
The Rav suggested that to fully capture the Sinaitic flavor of keriyat Ha-Torah, the attendance of an entire nation would be necessary. Har Sinai is repeatedly referred to (Devarim 9:10, 10:4, 18:16) as yom hakahal the day of assembly, in which the entire nation (according to midrashic sources, even future unborn Jews) convened to receive the word of God. Reinstating that experience would demand a similar kahal or population of Jews. Obviously, unable to convene a national audience, we allocate three aliyot to capture symbolically that which we cannot achieve through actual expression. By designating three aliyot we achieve a numeric-representative sampling of an entire nation and capture the full flavor of yom hakahal, thereby lending to keriyat ha-Torah its Sinaitic quality.
An additional halakhic consequence of this aligning keriyat
ha-Torah to Sinai emerges from a Rambam in Hilkhot Tefilla 12:6 in which
he requires the baal keriyah to repeat basically any mistake in the
reading - even phonetic mistakes which may not alter the actual meaning. Interestingly enough, the Rema does not
adopt this stringency forcing correction only for instances in which the content
was affected by the misreading. The
Rav explained the Rambam's stringency about the reading of keriyat ha-Torah
as an enactment of Har Sinai.
To fully capture the moment at Sinai not only must the 'stage' resemble
the original delivery (standing, intermediaries and an assembly). The rendered text must exhibit fidelity
to the original rendering. Even if
no cognitive differences emerge, if the text is rendered differently the
experience of Sinai may be compromised.
In fact, the Rav reported, that
Of course, this tethering of keriyat ha-Torah to Har Sinai cannot be predicated upon the aforementioned source in Parashat Beshalach of wandering without water for three days - a description which occurred PRIOR to Har Sinai. Evidently, keriyat ha-Torah was instituted for alternate reasons, and after Har Sinai it became reconstituted as a reenactment of Har Sinai.
The Rav asserted, instead, that employing public Torah reading as a reenactment of Har Sinai stems from a more concrete source - the practice of hakhel. When the Rambam describes the once-in-seven year public reading he writes (Chagiga 3:6): 'Even converts (who may not yet appreciate the nuances of Torah) are obligated to listen with fear and awe AS THOUGH IT WERE THE ACTUAL DAY IN WHICH THE TORAH WAS DELIVERED EACH PERSON SHOULD ENVISION THEMSELVES AS IF JUST NOW COMMANDED FROM GOD HIMSELF.' The Rambam justifies the rendering of hakhel by the king because he serves as God's agent to deliver Torah. Hearing Torah from him (with the typical fear associated with a king) helps agitate the requisite fear and awe in memory of Sinai. The Rambam views hakhel's reading of the Torah as an attempt to recreate the experience at Har Sinai. This association is captured in the very name of the mitzva hakhel - which invokes the great assembly which characterized Har Sinai. The Torah actually demands the presence at hakhel of every man, woman and child even though the latter two may not be formally obligated to STUDY Torah, since their presence assures the presence of a sweeping and all encompassing assembly. The legislation of hakhel as a reenactment of Sinai may have been the source for the reconstitution of keriyat ha-Torah (a pre-Sinai custom) into a reenactment of Har Sinai.