Template of the Diaspora
Parshat HaShavua
Yeshivat Har Etzion
This parasha
series is dedicated
in memory of Michael Jotkowitz, z"l.
********************************************************
PARASHAT VAYIGASH
*********************************************************
This shiur is dedicated in memory of Stanley (Yisrael Menachem ben Chaim Meir)
Fuchs – whose yahrzeit is yud
aleph Tevet.
*********************************************************
*********************************************************
Please join us in
praying for the health of the Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel ben Devora.
*********************************************************
Template of the
Diaspora
By Rav Tamir Granot
A. Introduction – Yosef's
activities in Egypt
The Torah devotes some fourteen
verses in chapter 47 (vv. 13-26) to a description of Yosef's
economic stewardship of Egypt during the years of famine: he purchases tracts
of land - and eventually also the people — as servants to Pharaoh, he oversees
a resettlement project, etc. It is
difficult to understand how this description contributes anything to our
understanding of the order of events, either in terms of the internal relations
amongst Ya'akov's household, or from the point of
view of the historical developments that lead to the Egyptians' enslavement of
the Jews and everything that follows. We
could read the Torah (and in particular, the end of Sefer Bereishit) quite well without this
section about Yosef; indeed, for many people –
including, most likely, some of the readers of this shiur
– this section is not regarded as a dominant element in our traditional
collective perception of Sefer Bereishit and the history of Israel. What is the
Torah's point in telling us this story in such painstaking detail?
·
Some commentators (e.g., the Ramban) view this
passage as presenting a sterling example of economic planning during a crisis,
and they suggest that it comes to teach us the extent of Yosef's
wisdom. However, the Torah does not
usually devote attention to challenges or issues that lie outside of the realms
of either morality, divine commandments, or history, and it is difficult to
imagine that an exceptional situation such as this one can serve as an example
for inspiration and imitation.
·
Other commentators (see Nechama Leibowitz's study on this passage) emphasize the special
treatment accorded to the Egyptian priesthood (kohanim),
highlighting the contrast between its status (v. 22: "Only the land of the
priests he did not buy, for this was a statute for the priests from
Pharaoh…") and that of the kohanim amongst Am Yisra'el,
concerning whom we are told (Devarim 18:2):
"They shall have no inheritance among their brethren; God is their
inheritance…" In other words, the
Egyptian priest enjoys preferential status with respect to his inheritance,
while an Israelite kohen
– since he is a servant of God – may own no inheritance, so that his status as
a Temple worker will not help to create an economic elite and open the door to
corruption.
·
Still others (e.g., the Radak) have underlined
Yosef's loyalty to Pharaoh, based on the textual
confirmation, over and over, that Yosef collects all
the profits "for Pharaoh's house," taking nothing for himself. This may quite conceivably be one of the
messages that we should learn from the section, but it would appear not to be
the main one.
I believe that a more thorough
examination of the passage in question, against the background of its location
and the adjacent sections, may lead us to a different conclusion as to the
purpose of the documentation of Yosef's activities in
Egypt. Let us first look at this passage
in context, analyzing it without judging it or jumping to conclusions as to its
message. Once we have a literary analysis
to work with, we may move on to deciding on the message of the story as a unit.
Our passage is presented in bold, while the preceding (46:28, 47:1-6, 11-12)
and succeeding (47:27) sections are in italics.
And he
sent Yehuda ahead of him, to Yosef,
to show the way before him to Goshen, and they came to the land of Goshen…
Yosef came and told Pharaoh, and he said: "My
father and my brothers, with their flocks and their cattle and all that is
theirs, have come from the land of Kena'an, and
behold: they are in the land of Goshen."
And he took some of his brothers – five men – and presented them before
Pharaoh. And Pharaoh said to his
brothers, "What is your occupation?" and they answered Pharaoh,
"Your servants are shepherds; both we and our fathers." They said to
Pharaoh: "We have come to sojourn in the land, for there is no pasture for
the flocks that your servants possess, for the famine is severe in the land of Kena'an; and now, please allow your servants to dwell in
the land of Goshen." Pharaoh said
to Yosef, saying: "Your father and your brothers
have come to you. The land of Egypt is
before you; settle your father and your brothers in the best of the land, let
them settle in the land of Goshen. And
if you know of any capable men among them, you shall make them officers over my
flocks…"
Yosef settled his father and his brothers, giving
them a possession in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land – in the land
of Rameses, as Pharaoh had commanded. And Yosef nourished
his father and his brothers, and everyone of his father's household, with bread
– according to their children.
And there
was no bread throughout the land, for the famine was most severe, and the
So
Let us now pay attention to the
verses that form the "framework" in the above presentation. The section preceding the detailed
description of Yosef's economic policies concerns Yosef's tending to his brothers and his father's household
in Egypt, and his exploitation of his special status for their benefit
vis-א-vis Pharaoh. Verse 27, which
concludes this section, speaks of the family of
B. Yosef's policies
concerning the Egyptians
What are the various stages of Yosef's activities? The following progression may be
discerned:
1.
As a first stage, the Egyptians buy produce for money – the profits from
the years of plenty.
2.
Then, they buy produce in return for their livestock. In other words, Pharaoh's first dream
(41:1-4) is fulfilled within the second (ibid., vv. 5-7), as it were, for the
lean ears of corn have caused the disappearance of both the fat ears (those of
the years of plenty, as well as those that were converted into money, with
which produce could later be bought) and of the fat cows – i.e., their own
cattle.
3.
As a third stage, Yosef buys up their land and
thereby also the independence of the Egyptians, who are now converted from
property-owners to lease-holders of the kingdom (in their words,
"servants"; in Hebrew, "avadim"
can also mean "slaves"); in other words, the agreement forced upon
them by Yosef meant that landowners lost their rights
to their land, and henceforth worked the land as laborers
who were paid for their labor. Thus, all the land became Pharaoh's property,
and his power was greatly augmented. Yosef's proposal appears generous, since it leaves the
Egyptian sharecroppers with 80% of the produce, but in truth the real profits
were obviously much lower, since a large portion of the produce simply covered
the labor expenses and served as the farmers' source
of sustenance.
4.
"And as for the people, he moved them to the cities, from one end
of Egypt's borders to the other" – Yosef
undertakes a resettlement project. What
does this mean? There are two ways of understanding this tactic:
a.
Yosef built cities, or neighborhoods in cities, and settled the people there at
the expense of rural settlement. If this
is the case, this represents a continuation of Yosef's
policy of centralization and an expression of the trend towards severing
landowners from their land.
b.
Alternatively, we may posit that Yosef
resettled the Egyptians through an act of population exchange. According to this explanation, the expression
"from one end of Egypt's borders to the other" refers to the
settlement itself, i.e., people moved from one place of habitation to another,
from one end of Egypt to the other. The
purpose of this would obviously be the physical complement to the formal
law. A landowner who has lost his formal
rights still feels some connection towards his land; once he moves elsewhere he
is completely severed from it, as though he were a stranger in his own land.
We may summarize the results of Yosef's actions as being based on the following principles:
a.
Centralization
b.
Loss of independence for landowners
c.
Creation of complete dependence on the central government
d.
Nomadic uprootedness
C. Yosef's actions
towards his brothers:
Ya'akov
and his sons arrive in Egypt devoid of any rights. They are "strangers." The status of a stranger, in the ancient
world, was problematic. We may point to Avraham, who arrives in Eretz Kena'an as a stranger and finds himself (Chapter 23)
lacking a burial place for his wife and unable, save for the locals'
magnanimity, to purchase one: this is a civic right that a stranger, who is
'dispossessed' (in the sense of lacking any fixed possession), simply
lacks. The fact that the brothers enjoy
the benefits of their proximity to Yosef and of
Pharaoh's protection facilitates their survival for the short term; for the
longer term, it is clear to Yosef that this will not
suffice. He will die; or Pharaoh will
die, or may change his views, or may demote Yosef –
and then they will be left with nothing.
Yosef understands that he must anchor his
brothers' status, both legally and practically.
In his cunning, he achieves this in several stages:
1.
First, he sends his family to the land of Goshen, without asking
Pharaoh. (It must be remembered that
Pharaoh did promise, in 45:18, "I shall give you the goodness of the land
of Egypt," but gave no indication of any specific region.)
2.
Then, Yosef prepares his brothers (46:31-34)
for the request that they must make of Pharaoh; it must come from them.
3.
As a third stage, he tells Pharaoh that his family has arrived, and
mentions – quite 'innocently' – that "they are in the land of
Goshen."
4.
Lastly, he presents five men – "some of his brothers" – who
tell Pharaoh about their occupation as shepherds and request that they be
allowed to live in the land of Goshen, which is suitable for pasture. Obviously, Pharaoh is quite well aware that
the separation between Goshen and central Egypt is also convenient since
(46:34) "Any shepherd is an abomination to Egypt."
Now, Pharaoh is left with no
alternative but to draw the obvious conclusion arising from his own promise and
from the request by Yosef and his brothers:
"Settle your father and your brothers in the best of the land; let them
settle in the land of Goshen…" The
words "in the best of the land" refer back to his promise, "I
shall give you the goodness of the land of Egypt" [emphasis added],
which – thanks to Yosef's cunning – has been
interpreted to mean the land of Goshen. Yosef himself also wants a part of the land that possesses
a measure of independence with respect to the central kingdom.
However, these steps facilitate only
the brothers' settlement; their naturalization and success are not yet
assured. These aims are achieved at the
height of the years of famine, when Yosef takes care
of his family's sustenance. From the
Egyptians he takes money – all their money, but when it comes to his family,
"Yosef nourished… everyone of his father's
household with bread" – in other words, he demands no payment from
them. Attention should be paid to the
fact that the textual description creates a synchronicity between Yosef's concern for his brothers and the suffering caused
by the famine. Verse 13, following on
from verse 12 quoted above, reads as follows: "And" — or
"But" — "there was no bread throughout the land… and the land of
Egypt languished…" In other words,
the "and"/ "but" renders the phrase in the present tense:
the time that is being referred to is the same as in the previous description,
in verse 12, describing Yosef's concern for his
brothers. Therefore the significance of
these two verses and the relationship between them may be understood as
meaning: "Yosef sustained his family with bread…
and" — at the same time — "there was no bread in Egypt"
because of the famine. Yosef does not provide his brothers with unlimited
quantities of bread; there is a well-defined quota, as the Torah takes pains to
emphasize ("according to the children"), but they are not included
within the overall plan for Egypt's economic restructuring.
D. Conclusions
The result of Yosef's
actions is obvious: "Israel dwelled in the land of Egypt, in the land of
Goshen, and they took possession of it and grew and multiplied
greatly." Ya'akov's
family undergoes two important processes:
1. Settlement and possession of the region of
Goshen
2. Large-scale natural increase.
To fully grasp the importance of Yosef's effort, we need to compare parallel passages about
Israel in Goshen in Parashat Vayigash,
Parashat Vayechi,
and Parashat Shemot:
|
Vayigash 47:11-12, 27 |
Vayechi (50:18-21) |
Shemot (1:5-6) |
|
Yosef settled his father and his brothers, and gave them a possession in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land, in the land of Rameses, as Pharaoh had commanded. And Yosef nourished his father and brothers and everyone of his father's household with bread, according to the children… And Israel dwelled in the land of Egypt, in the land of Goshen, and they took possession of it and grew and multiplied greatly. |
His brothers also fell before him, and said: "Behold, we are servants to you." But Yosef said to them, "Do not fear, for am I in place of God? Although you planned evil against me, God planned it for the good, in order to bring it about this day that the lives of many people should be saved. And now, fear not; I shall sustain you and your children." And he comforted them, and spoke kindly to them. |
Yosef died, and all of his brothers, and all of that generation. And the children of Israel grew and swarmed and multiplied and grew exceedingly great, and the land was filled with them." |
An uninterrupted reading of these
verses creates a picture of clear development which, when viewed only on the
basis of the verse in Shemot, as is usually the case,
is understood without the benefit of its causes, and is therefore interpreted
as a miraculous phenomenon. In fact, the
reproductive increase of Benei Yisra'el and their naturalization and possession of the
land are the direct result of Yosef's actions.
First, Yosef
obtains the land of Goshen for his brothers, and, according to the text,
"gave them a possession." Thus
their status is made equal, at least formally, to that of the Egyptian
citizenry, although we may assume that their foreignness still cast something
of a shadow on their acceptance. The big
change comes about during the years of famine, and here the period of famine
assumes a significance that usually passes unnoticed: during these years – a
period of destitution and distress for the Egyptians – Benei
Yisra'el continue to flourish. They possess their portion of land and it
becomes their inheritance, at the very same time that the Egyptian citizens
lose their possession of the land and become Pharaoh's servants. Thus their status is greatly upgraded, and
they in fact become "preferred citizens" – like the priests of Egypt,
the only ones who own property. The easy
conditions and stability also apparently served as a convenient basis for
accelerated natural increase, which stands out all the more prominently against
the background of Egyptian constriction.
The Torah describes this development through the use of a string of
verbs. First, "they dwelled… took
possession… and were fruitful and multiplied," specifically, "in the
land of Egypt, in the land of Goshen."
Later on, "they increased and swarmed and multiplied and grew
exceedingly great, and the land" – meaning, not only the land of Goshen,
but all of Egypt — was filled with them."
After Ya'akov's
death, the brothers fear Yosef's revenge. This fear is based on the assumption that all
of his concern for them arose only from honor for his
father. Their proposal is in fact that
their status be lowered to equal that of the rest of the Egyptian subject:
"Behold, we are your servants."
Yosef calms them and renews his commitment,
using similar wording: "I shall sustain you and your children."
Let us attempt to summarize and draw
some conclusions, in light of our analysis, as to Yosef's
aims in his actions in Egypt, and the Torah's objective in recounting this
story.
Firstly, it turns out that the
famine in Egypt, thanks to Yosef's astute analysis
and planning, is actually a source of blessing for Ya'akov's
family; in the wake of this period the family indeed turns into a national
group: "God planned it for the good, in order to bring it about this day
that the lives of many people should be saved." Yosef's actions are
a central factor in this process, and thus his leadership becomes the basis for
the physical creation of Am Yisra'el. Our tradition devotes much attention to the
difference between "Mashiach ben
Yosef," the messiah who will be descended from Yosef, and "Mashiach ben David;" a prevalent view, developed at length by Rav Kook, is that "Mashiach ben Yosef" will be the
source of the physical, national salvation of Am Yisra'el. In light of our discussion above, there can
be no doubt that the historical Yosef plays a central
role in making a nation out of the children of Israel – i.e., creating a large
community that lives within its own inheritance (not Eretz
Yisra'el, but Eretz Goshen)
through his actions that simultaneously benefit Israel and lower the status of
the Egyptians.
Further to the above, we must go
back and revisit Yosef's dreams. His first dream (37:5-8) concerns sheaves of
wheat: he sees himself as the economic leader of the family. In his youth, this dream is interpreted as
symbolizing Yosef's physical superiority over his
brothers. In his maturity, Yosef understands that Divine Providence has created a
mission for him specifically in the land of Egypt, as the economic leader of
the country, so as to facilitate the growth of the tribes of Israel on the
fertile soil of Egypt. The dream told Yosef that a day would come when, from a position of power,
he could provide the basis for the growth from a family into a nation. The second dream (37:9-11) set forth Yosef's royal, messianic status throughout the generations,
alongside the kingship of Yehuda and the house of
David. Yosef's
actions in Egypt grant him the status of a sort of "founding king"
with respect to the tribes of Israel, as he leads the family through the
corridor that lies between the tribal situation and the national state. Thus, Yosef becomes
a sort of fourth forefather, or first king, in the history of Israel. Obviously, his special status is given
prominent expression in rabbinic and kabbalistic
tradition, as he represents one of the sefirot,
the divine attributes, as well as being one of the seven ushpizin,
the holy guests we welcome.
However, it is quite possible that
the Torah recounts the story for another reason – altogether removed from Yosef's motives.
Later on in the story, in Parashat Shemot, we read of the words of the "new king"
(1:9): "He said to his nation: Behold, the nation of the children of
Israel is more numerous and greater than we…" The words "more numerous and
greater" echo the Torah's previous description of how Benei
Yisra'el "multiplied and grew exceedingly
great." In other words, there is a
connection between the process that Yosef brings
about, and the Egyptian suspicion and hatred.
The "success" of Yosef's project was
dependent, to a considerable degree, on his own personality and status within
Pharaoh's household. The death of both Yosef's Pharaoh and of Yosef
himself revealed the situation of Benei Yisra'el in Egypt in all its problematic
instability. Some commentators maintain
that the throne was ascended not only by a new king, but by a new dynasty (the
18th, initiating what historians refer to as Egypt's "New
Kingdom"), which replaced the Hyksos dynasty
that had extended support to Yosef and the children
of Israel – apparently because of the Semitic origins of the Hyksos. Whether or
not this thesis is correct, the syndrome of the development of hatred that is
displayed here is clearly archetypal. Benei Yisra'el are
living in a land that is not theirs; they enjoy a relatively high standard of
living and special status thanks to the success of someone among them and his
connections with the rulers.
Nevertheless, the success and status are only external and formal; the
moment that the human factors disappear (through change of attitude, external
contingencies or death), their success boomerangs and turns into jealousy. Latent hatred awakens, emanating from the
deepest recesses of the soul and of society, becoming a central motive in the
ensuing persecution. Obviously, all of
this took place through no fault of Yosef, just as it
was never the fault of good, successful Jews who helped to establish their
brethren's status in the Diaspora over generations, and whose goodness
ultimately became a source of jealousy and hatred.
This may be the deeper message of
the text in narrating the story of Yosef. If he – whose talent and cunning were certainly
extraordinary, whose concern for his family was unstinting, who held almost
unlimited power and who succeeded in turning around the economic and civic
system to the benefit of his family (according to our thesis) – was unable to
prevent to halt the anti-Israelite (or, in today's terms, anti-Semitic)
movement that developed in Egypt, then Am Yisra'el
will not be able to escape the decree of exile and foreignness in other places,
in less favorable circumstances. The story of Am Yisra'el
with Yosef in Egypt is the story of the first Jewish
exile, which includes the principal elements of the exiles that were destined
to follow.
Translated by Kaeren Fish